European Parliament Confirms Postponement of CSRD ReportingRequirements
- Ronald
- Apr 3
- 4 min read

The European Parliament has now formally approved the delay in mandatory
sustainability reporting for large companies under the Corporate Sustainability
Reporting Directive (CSRD). Originally, these requirements were set to apply from
the 2025 financial year, but the new timetable postpones the obligation for most large
enterprises to the 2027 financial year. This development follows the earlier backing
from the European Commission and the recent support of the European Council,
providing clarity and breathing room for many organizations.
Below is a concise overview of the key points and implications:
1. Background on the CSRD
The CSRD is part of the European Union’s strategy to encourage greater
transparency and accountability regarding environmental, social, and governance
(ESG) impacts. By mandating more extensive and standardised
reporting, the
directive aims to help stakeholders—such as investors, employees, customers, and
regulators—better assess companies’ sustainability practices and performance.
Initially, the plan was to replace and expand upon the existing Non-Financial
Reporting Directive (NFRD) by introducing detailed disclosure requirements starting
in 2025. However, the new “stop-the-clock” directive temporarily shifts these
timetables.
2. Approved Postponement Under the approved postponement:
- Public Interest Entities (PIEs) with more than 500 employees are still
required to begin CSRD reporting from the 2025 financial year, continuing into
2026.
- Other large companies (those not classified as PIEs (Public Interest
Companies) and meeting the specified size thresholds) now have until 2027
before their reporting obligations kick in—effectively granting a two-year
extension.
This means that thousands of large enterprises across the EU will benefit from
additional time to align their internal data-gathering and compliance processes with
the extensive requirements of the CSRD.
3. The “Stop-the-Clock” Directive
The proposal to postpone these reporting obligations was introduced as part of the
European Commission’s omnibus package in late February.
Titled the “stop-the-clock” directive, it was designed to address:
- Implementation Challenges: Many companies cited difficulties preparing for
new, in-depth data collection, especially in areas like value chain emissions
and social standards.
- Standardization Issues: The European Sustainability Reporting Standards
(ESRS) are still evolving, and certain details regarding reporting frameworks
and methodologies needed greater clarification.
- Data Quality and Consistency: Ensuring the data’s accuracy and reliability
remains a challenge. Policymakers and stakeholders wanted to make sure the
systems and guidelines for data verification and audit are robust.
With the European Parliament’s backing, the “stop-the-clock” directive effectively
becomes law—awaiting only the final, largely procedural, green light from the
European Commission before it is published.
4. Practical Implications for Companies
- Extended Preparation Window: Enterprises that are no longer bound by the
2025 deadline gain two additional years to refine their sustainability data
infrastructure and reporting procedures.
- Resource Allocation: The extended timeline allows for a more measured
approach to investment in technology, training, and personnel needed to
comply with future CSRD obligations.
- Strategic Alignment: Companies now have a better opportunity to align their
sustainability strategies with long-term business goals and to integrate CSRD
reporting into broader ESG initiatives.
- Less Immediate Pressure: While the directive maintains its focus on
advancing sustainability transparency, the urgency for compliance by 2025 is
now lifted for non-PIEs.
However, it is important to note that public interest entities with more than 500
employees must still prepare for their CSRD obligations starting in 2025. They will be
acting as front-runners in adopting and showcasing best practices in sustainability
reporting and data management.
5. What to Watch Next
1. Publication of the Final Directive: Although the European Commission’s
approval is technically still pending, it is largely a formality at this stage.
Companies can expect the “stop-the-clock” directive to be published and
enacted soon.
2. Evolving ESRS Guidance: The European Financial Reporting Advisory
Group (EFRAG) continues to refine the European Sustainability Reporting
Standards (ESRS). Their guidance will be critical for companies preparing for
eventual compliance.
3. Implementation Support: Expect more guidelines, workshops, and sector-
specific support to emerge as regulators and industry associations prepare for
2027.
4. Voluntary Early Adoption: Some enterprises may still choose to align with
the CSRD framework prior to 2027, especially if they regard robust ESG
reporting as a competitive advantage or a means of nurturing trust among
investors and customers.
6. Recommendations for Businesses
1. Begin Preparations Early: Even though deadlines have shifted, sustainability
reporting is becoming a cornerstone of corporate accountability. Early
planning can help reduce compliance risks.
2. Invest in Data Systems: Consider implementing or upgrading systems that
capture, manage, and verify sustainability data—particularly for complex
areas like supply chain emissions or social metrics.
3. Engage Stakeholders: From investors to employees and suppliers, open
dialogue fosters better alignment on sustainability goals and clarifies
expectations.
4. Monitor Legislative Changes: Keep an eye on updates from the EU as well
as EFRAG’s evolving standards to ensure your reporting strategy remains on
track.
Conclusion
The European Parliament’s confirmation of the CSRD reporting delay means many
large companies can now breathe a sigh of relief. However, this reprieve should not
be mistaken for a reason to postpone essential preparations. The shift underscores
the EU’s desire for a realistic timeline that balances the ambition for transparent,
high-quality ESG reporting with the practicalities of implementation.
As the “stop-the-clock” directive takes effect and the new timetable takes shape,
companies can use this time advantageously. By investing in robust data collection,
enhancing sustainability strategies, and staying attentive to ongoing EU updates,
businesses will be well-positioned to meet the eventual 2027 obligations and
demonstrate leadership in corporate sustainability.
Comments